Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 84 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Natasha’s Applying NMA Studies to 100 Portraits #777447
    NatashaNatasha
    Participant
    No points.

    No 40. The muses graced me with their favor! I don’t know, I just like how this one turned out. I didn’t want to use a pen (pen seems to work on masculine forms better for me) but I also wanted a challenge so I worked the entire portrait with my mechanical pencil and almost no blending (plenty of erasing though).

    no 40

    pencil

    in reply to: Natasha’s Applying NMA Studies to 100 Portraits #776524
    NatashaNatasha
    Participant
    No points.

    No 39. Expressive faces with lots of folds are so much easier for the pen. I find a cheap bic works best for controlling the strokes, to make them lighter or heavier as needed.

    39

    in reply to: Natasha’s Applying NMA Studies to 100 Portraits #775667
    NatashaNatasha
    Participant
    No points.

    No 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40

    It’s weird how some days I can pull from all my learning and put together a great portrait, and then the very next day it’s if I can’t do anything right. I think it is this fluctuation that marks an amateur.

    35: I resort to pencil when I’m really crunched for time, but I’m still trying to reduce physical blending and work more with developing subtlty directly from the pencil. This time I was also exploring some cross-hatching with the eraser.

    36: Back to pen and trying not to lose my patience. Since there’s no erasing it involves a lot more from the prefrontal cortex and planning ahead.

    37: Can you tell when I rush? Yes.

    38: Experimenting again. I wanted to explore completely straight lines for shading. . . no curving across the form. It’s a lot more playful and I thing that is conveyed in the drawing.no 35

    no 36

    no 37no 38

    in reply to: Natasha’s Applying NMA Studies to 100 Portraits #772830
    NatashaNatasha
    Participant
    No points.

    No 34. I have always had an aversion to charcoal…it’s so messy, out of control, unforgiving…until now. This is the most fun with charcoal I’ve ever had. I worked hard to follow Iliya and mass in the general shapes first with big swipes of charcoal. Towards the end of the demonstration, I was no longer following along and just watching his subtler development. This particular portrait differs from my others in that this one is 18×24…much larger than the others in my 7×10 sketchbook.

    no 34

    in reply to: Natasha’s Applying NMA Studies to 100 Portraits #772161
    NatashaNatasha
    Participant
    No points.

    No 32 and 33. 3233

    in reply to: Natasha’s Applying NMA Studies to 100 Portraits #771496
    NatashaNatasha
    Participant
    No points.

    No 28, 29, 30, 31 just truckin’ along. Like I mentioned before, I’m actually on number 5o something so I’m trying to get caught up here. One thing I’ve been working on is trying to accomplish more with pencil/pen strokes than with blending. That’s why switching to pen has been hard but the challenge has been fun. The fourth image here was a speed run and I probably spent no more than 20 minutes on it.

    282920

    31

    in reply to: Natasha’s Applying NMA Studies to 100 Portraits #770676
    NatashaNatasha
    Participant
    No points.

    I spent a ridiculous amount of time on this but still could not achieve the sensitivity to the subject matter that Iliya does. Laying so much shading at the beginning is wildly different than I’m used to so requires a leap of faith. The good news is that I’m starting to understand the planes of the head a lot better.

    No 27

    in reply to: Andres’s 100 Day Challenge: Sight-size drawing Bargue plates #770237
    NatashaNatasha
    Participant
    No points.

    Sweet! His lessons are on my to-do list.

    in reply to: My continuous digital painting work #770078
    NatashaNatasha
    Participant
    No points.

    Digital painting always amazes me. Good work!

     

    in reply to: Muscles of the Face Study #769852
    NatashaNatasha
    Participant
    No points.

    Oh wow! When I did this project, I was completely overwhelmed by all the detail. You did a great job!

    in reply to: Introduction to Animal Anatomy – Chems #769851
    NatashaNatasha
    Participant
    No points.

    You make it look so easy! Beautiful work. Makes me want to change courses.

    in reply to: Natasha’s Applying NMA Studies to 100 Portraits #769835
    NatashaNatasha
    Participant
    No points.

    Here I’m trying to recreate what I learned in Iliya’s course while it’s still fresh, but it’s easier to copy a master than to apply it to your own work. I’m hoping practice will somehow make it sink in. I’m still amazed at how Iliya disappears his lines and shortcuts his reflected light. No 23

    And then I decided to try a mixed-media aaaaaannnnnnd *pfft…..disaster. I really messed up on the neck. No 24

    mixed media

    No 25. Getting back on track. When I’m super busy, I resort to pencil because I can whip it out much faster.

    no 25

    No. 26. I wanted to explore some different lighting and thought some backlighting would be a nice challenge.

    no 26

     

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 1 month ago by NatashaNatasha.
    • This reply was modified 4 years, 1 month ago by NatashaNatasha.
    in reply to: Natasha’s Applying NMA Studies to 100 Portraits #769821
    NatashaNatasha
    Participant
    No points.

    Slowly, slowly getting through the Russian figure course. There’s something not quite right about her but I can’t put my finger on it and I can’t seem to capture that magic that Iliya adds to his drawings.

    NO next

    in reply to: Natasha’s Applying NMA Studies to 100 Portraits #767800
    NatashaNatasha
    Participant
    No points.

    No 21. I just had to talk about this one because it was before I had gotten to Iliya’s neck and shoulders demonstration. And though I still haven’t memorized the names of anything, I can see what’s wrong, especially with the clavicles. So it is sinking slowly in. Makes me want to go back and rewatch that lesson.

    No 21

    in reply to: Natasha’s Applying NMA Studies to 100 Portraits #766141
    NatashaNatasha
    Participant
    No points.

    Forgive me while I try to play catch-up. I’m actually on day 50 of the challenge! I just decided really late in the game to start posting here. This is 16, 17, 18, 19, 20. Two steps forward, one step back, am I right? lol

    The first one is pencil, then two in pastel, pencil again (a copy of John Singer Sargent’s…I was trying to see if I could match his cross-hatching), and lastly, pastel again but I was forcing myself to not blend and describe the form with the weight of the strokes.

    no whatever

    no 17

    no. 18

    no18

    no 19

     

     

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 84 total)